.
Political Tidbits is the prestigious column of Belinda Olivares-Cunanan that ran for 25 continuous years in the op-ed page of the Philippine Daily Inquirer, the newspaper that she helped put up with its multi-awarded founder, the legendary Eugenia Duran-Apostol, in December 1985, just two months before the EDSA Revolution.

Monday, August 10, 2015

Computer expert denounces to JCOC on AES chair Koko Pimentel tampering of election returns in 2013 elections, executed through “Workfile server” inserted by Smartmatic between the ‘Transparency Server’ operated by PPCRV and four authorized election data recipients of election returns. With Smartmatic’s shady record, citizens have every reason to dread tampered results in 2016 elections.




Last March 22, 2015, Leo Querubin, President of the Philippine Computer Society, wrote Sen. Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III, chair of the Joint Congressional Oversight Committee (JCOC) on the Automated Election System, a letter pertaining to Smartmatic-TIM. A copy of Querubin’s letter was furnished me by the computer professionals at last week’s hearing of the JCOC at the Senate, where some of them aired the people’s grievances against Smartmatic.

Nothing I heard there, however, equals the import of Querubin’s letter, for it shows in black and white, and later in diagrams I’m reproducing here, how our elections  have been tampered with in 2013 and perhaps even in 2010. If we do not do anything about Comelec’s recent award to Smartmatic to lease some 93,977 new units of the Optical Mark Reader (OMR) machines at a whopping P12.6 billion, with offer to purchase (OTP), we may see a repeat of this terrible development---a crying shame for a democracy.

XXX

Querubin’s  startling letter quoted the Comelec Advisory Council (CAC)’s “Post-Election Report on the Use of the Automated Election System in the 2013 National and Local Elections, submitted to the JCOC AES last January 2014. On Page 18,  the CAC report said that contrary to official thinking “it was further found the day after Election Day that a laptop was installed as an intermediary “workfile server” between the Transparency Server and the workstations of four authorized recipients and the Rappler Server.” The report said this was disclosed by Smartmatic-TIM when it met with KBP, PPCRV and Namfrel “to explain the deletion of files” that Smartmatic made at the Transparency Server on the early morning after Election Day.

The report asserted that “This modification may have made the system vulnerable, resulting in security breach, open to online interference or manipulation. (emphasis BOC's)”

XXX

Let’s process that paragraph a bit. Day after the 2013 elections a laptop was installed by Smartmatic as a “workfile server,” AN INTERMEDIARY between the Transparency Server operated by the Parish Pastoral Council for Responsible Voting (PPCRV)  and four authorized “workstations,” including citizens’ arm groups, to which PPCRV serves election data on who was winning and who was being left behind. What was stunning are two facts: l). the installation by Smartmatic of this intermediary which was not supposed to be there, and 2). the admission by Smartmatic’s Technology Manager, Marlon Garcia, that some files it made at the PPCRV-operated Transparency Server in the early morning after Election Day had been deleted from this server. 

As Querubin put it, “In any IT system implementation, no one can delete files unless fully authorized by Management.” He then asserts that “it would be wise to ask Smartmatic and Comelec to show the document (it must have been an en banc resolution) that authorized Smartmatic-TIM to delete such files." In addition, Querubin asserts that Smartmatic should also be asked where the archived files (i.e., deleted files but saved as archived, to be used for audit purposes later) are stored. 

I would include summoning PPCRV on how this happened at the Transparency Server it was operating at that time.

XXX

But there is still the worst about that episode involving the “Workfile server”, which, as Querubin put it, was “the most worrying statement” in the CAC report. This is that “The Comelec website in the 2013 National and Local Elections derived its data from the ‘Workfile server’ that intermediated the Transparency Server and the four recipients.”

The four recipients were the Majority Party workstation, the Dominant Minority Party workstation, the Accredited Citizens’ Arm (Namfrel) workstation, the Kapisanan ng mga Brodcasters ng Pilipinas (KBP) workstation. These outfits were all receiving their data from the Workfile server and in turn were dishing these out to the entire nation hanging on tenterhooks by then!

XXX

But this is not all: this Workfile server also served as the source of data served to the entire nation by the Comelec Website. If this Workfile server was inserted as “filter” by Smartmatic to the Transparency Server of the PPCRV, were these data then corrupted or untrue, or being manipulated to serve the interest of some candidates against those of others?

Querubin of the Computer Society asserts rightly that “The workfile server taints the results of the process. It disrupts the chain of custody of election returns. Hence, it boggles the mind why Comelec would use a tainted source for its Comelec website, knowing full well that the Comelec website is the public facing source of election results.” Querubin says “It will be wise to ask Smartmatic-TIM and Comelec what was the purpose of the Workfile server and who was manning it." 

Definitely,  PPCRV should also face the inquisition board.

If this happened in 2013, with Smartmatic being involved again by Comelec for the 2016 elections, what would happen then? Something really is rotten and it’s not in Denmark. If this happened in the US, it's easy to imagine how the US Congress would demand no less than a congressional investigation. Let's pray that Koko Pimentel's JCOC on the AES would be equal to the challenge from the IT people---for the sake of the nation.


                   (Charts supplied by the Philippine Computer Society)




















5 comments:

  1. Sa nababalitaan namin, ang resulta ng eleksyon ay tinarbaho sa workfile server. Ang "natarbaho" na boto ng kandidato (Candidate #1) na hindi nagbayad sa Smartmatic-Comelec ay binabawasan ng 30% mula sa bawat presinto at ang binawas na boto ni 'CAndidate #1" ay idinadagdag sa boto ni "Candidate #2" na nagbayad. Ang narinig ko mula sa isang kandidato sa pagka-Mayor, nilapitan siya ng isang taga-Smartmatic/Comelec at inalok ng tulong para siya manalo kapalit ang halagang 40 milyon pesos. Dahil tiwala si Kandidatong Mayor sa malaki niyang lamang sa mga surveys, at dahil kilala ang kanyang angkan bilang moog sa politika sa kanyang lungsod, di siya kumagat sa "binebentang tulong". Pagkatapos ng eleksyon, na-shock ang kandidatong Mayor dahil sa kanyang team, siya lang ang natalo. Ang kanyang Vice Mayor at mga konsehal ay pawang nanalo na may malaking kalamangan sa mga kalaban. Pero ang kalaban niyang Mayor ay nanalo sa napakaliit na lamang na 2 libo mahigit na boto lamang. At ang nakagulat pa lalo sa kanya.

    Nang siya ay mag-file ng election protest, lalo siyang nadismaya kasi ang Comelec ay parang tutang bahag ang buntot na hindi kinayang ipatupad ang halos 13 nitong mga order na inilipat ang mga balota sa korte mula sa City hall, kung kaya natapos ang 3 taon na hindi man lang nabigyan katarungan ang kanyang protesta.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Totoo na ang Smartmatic at Comelec noong bago mag election 2013 ay nag offer ng panalo kapalit ng 30-50 Million Pesos, at 8% ang lamang nya sa kalaban, kapag hindi pumayag ang unang kausap, lilipat sila sa kalaban at ito ang aalukin.

    ReplyDelete